Pat, Thanks for the response. On Feb 23, 1:43 pm, Pat Maddox <mailingli...@patmaddox.com> wrote: > I'm going to argue that your design is off, and then ignore the rest of your > post :)
Fair enough :) The 'design' in my example was made up on the spot to try and illustrate the kind of issues I've been coming up against without lots of irrelevant detail. I agree that the code has all sorts of silly issues. > > Also, RSpec has two mechanisms for testing collections the way you want (so I > guess I'm not ignoring your post after all). > Thanks for pointing me towards the include and =~ matchers. This was part of what I was looking for, and would solve a lot of the issues I've hit in the past. That said, I still feel that it would be helpful to have some way of applying a matcher against the elements of a collection. I will just have to come up with a more plausible example... :) Cheers, Pete _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
