On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Ashley Moran wrote:
> 
>> (2.5) Any reason why the new RSpec module is "Rspec" not "RSpec"? 
>> </grammarnazi>
> 
> AFAIK, autoloaders (like in Rails and Autotest), assume a CamelCase 
> convention for class names, which RSpec violates, and Rspec adheres to. If 
> I'm wrong about this, I'd prefer to make it RSpec, since that's the name of 
> the book and all :) Anybody have insights/opinions on this?
> 

Isn't CamelCase

([A-Z][a-zA-Z]*)+

If that's the case, RSpec is fine. If not, then classes like CGI are also hosed.

My $.02
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to