On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:04 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > On Mar 29, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Ashley Moran wrote: > >> (2.5) Any reason why the new RSpec module is "Rspec" not "RSpec"? >> </grammarnazi> > > AFAIK, autoloaders (like in Rails and Autotest), assume a CamelCase > convention for class names, which RSpec violates, and Rspec adheres to. If > I'm wrong about this, I'd prefer to make it RSpec, since that's the name of > the book and all :) Anybody have insights/opinions on this? >
Isn't CamelCase ([A-Z][a-zA-Z]*)+ If that's the case, RSpec is fine. If not, then classes like CGI are also hosed. My $.02 _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
