On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:16 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Michael Guterl wrote: > >> I'm curious what the current state of test spies in rspec is? >> >> What is everyone using for this? not a mock? rr? rspec-spies? >> I see that spies were going to be added to rspec 1.3.0, but pulled >> because of a bug >> (https://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/938), will this >> be brought back in? I really like the rspec standard mock / stub >> syntax and am hesitant to move to another solution. > > Not-a-mock works. Any reason not to just use that? >
Mostly because I like the default rspec stub / mock syntax. Adding not-a-mock replaces the entire mock framework: config.mock_with NotAMock::RspecMockFrameworkAdapter doing so causes all of my existing specs to break. It seemed like the built-in rspec solution did not require changing all of my existing mocks/stubs. Best, Michael Guterl _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
