On May 23, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote: > Rick, > > Cool, this looks like it should work. My original approach was to > find something that would work under autospec but I think that might > be getting too greedy in this case.
You could hook that up if you want to. Just need clear out the rspec mappings and replace them with your own - then you could have a conditional based on a command line param. I've got a few blog posts on configuring autotest: http://blog.davidchelimsky.net/?s=autotest HTH, David > Thank-you! > > - Brian > > On May 23, 12:54 pm, Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Brian Cardarella >> >> <bcardare...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I would like to support both ActiveRecord 2.x and ActiveModel 3.x for >>> a given library. It is not clear to me how to write tests for this. If >>> I require 'active_record' then all of the dependencies are also loaded >>> and are now in the load path as well as the Gem loaded list. >>> Considering that AR and AM share dependencies but of different >>> versions conflicts occur. >> >>> Is this possible? The difference in code is not enough to warrant >>> breaking into separate gems. >> >> I do something similar for RiCal, which works using either >> activesupport or the tzinfo gem. I've set up rake tasks to run the >> specs with either one. >> >> What I do is to have an auxiliary ruby file to do the right require >> which the spec task invokes via the -r option. >> >> You should be able to do something similar by having the auxiliary >> files use the gem directive to specify a particular version of >> active_record. >> >> Have a look athttp://github.com/rubyredrick/ri_cal/tree/master/tasks/ >> >> Particularly spec.rake and the files in the gem_loader sub directory. >> >> HTH >> >> -- >> Rick DeNatale >> >> Blog:http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ >> Github:http://github.com/rubyredrick >> Twitter: @RickDeNatale >> WWR:http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale >> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "rspec" group. >> To post to this group, send email to rs...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> rspec+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/rspec?hl=en. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
