Yeah, I'm not certain what the deal is. Here is my spec_helper: http://pastie.org/993256
I was using Spork but commented it out to see if that was an issue. Nope. I was using sqlite to see if the lack of a real transactional database was the issue. (changed to postgres) Nope. Not certain if this is of any help but here is my Gemfile: http://pastie.org/993259 (it's a mess, I know) This is confusing. :p - Brian On Jun 5, 3:42 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 5, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote: > > > On Jun 5, 2:12 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Brian Cardarella wrote: > > >>> Subject pretty much asks the question > > >> You _can_, but if you use ActiveRecord and start off with a clean DB, you > >> can use_transactional_examples (alias for use_transactional_fixtures, > >> which defaults to true in beta.10, but will default to false in beta.11). > > David, > > > I'm not seeing that behavior. > > > I have beta.10 and without using database_cleaner data is persisting > > after each spec and from suite run to suite run. I thought > > database_cleaner would resolve the issue but it doesn't seem to. > > I _am_ seeing that behaviour :) > > Are you using AR? What does your spec_helper look like? > > This cucumber feature passes: > > http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/blob/master/features/model_specs/... > > Not sure what's up, but there is something different about your environment. > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
