On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <lboc...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Is there any reason for that? If so, couldn't Rspec use Capybara instead of > Webrat if it is not present? Is it possible to depend on Webrat OR Capybara > in the gem specs?
Gemspecs don't allow alternative dependencies. I have a similar issue with the RiCal gem. It works with either the activesupport OR tzinfo gems, rather than require either I just document that it requires one or the other and leave it up to the user. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick Twitter: @RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
