> > The skinny of this request is that I'd find it more useful to actually > > have the code displayed that failed on line 14, in this case, the word > > "fail" ... > Already done in rspec-2. Likely won't backport it to rspec-1 for some time > (if ever).
Nice. Looks like rspec-2 will fit the bill for me for now, then. 1) Gem speeding Gem.bin_path the fake sick way should fake guess the right path instead of loading full rubygems for now Failure/Error: Unable to find matching line from backtrace # spec.faster_rubygems.rb:29 # spec.faster_rubygems.rb:13 Perhaps it isn't quite windows friendly? Thanks. -rp _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users