Hi David, Gemfile and spec/spec_helper (not sure what you mean with "in-line posting"? I hope it's ok like that, if not, let me know):
-> http://gist.github.com/456941 On Jun 28, 5:35 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Timo Rößner wrote: > > > > > On Jun 28, 5:03 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Timo Rößner wrote: > > >>> Hey guys, > > >>> I let the code speak for itself: > > >>> Below are my currently failing specs, please don't pay too much > >>> attention to the specs themselves, I just want to give you a "real > >>> life example" of what's happening - the only interesting thing about > >>> the specs is that there is a call to Factory(:challenge) in each of > >>> them and a before-each-call putting out what's currently in the > >>> database: > > >>> describe 'featuring' do > > >>> before(:each) do > >>> puts "Before Each:" > >>> puts "Featured Challenges size: #{Challenge.featured.size}" > >>> puts "Challenges count: #{Challenge.count}" > >>> end > > >>> it 'should tell if a challenge is featured' do > >>> challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1) > >>> challenge.should be_featured > >>> end > > >>> it 'should tell if a challenge is not featured' do > >>> challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 0) > >>> challenge.should_not be_featured > >>> end > > >>> it 'should feature a challenge' do > >>> challenge = Factory(:challenge) > >>> challenge.feature! > >>> Challenge.featured.should == [challenge] > >>> end > > >>> it 'should unfeature a challenge' do > >>> challenge = Factory(:challenge, :feature_position => 1) > >>> challenge.unfeature! > >>> Challenge.featured.should be_empty > >>> end > >>> end > > >>> Now to the interesting part: > > >>> A spec run using rails 2.3.5 and rspec 1: > > >>> bundle exec spec spec/models/challenge_spec.rb > >>> Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 0 > >>> Challenges count: 0 > >>> .Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 0 > >>> Challenges count: 0 > >>> .Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 0 > >>> Challenges count: 0 > >>> .Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 0 > >>> Challenges count: 0 > >>> .............................. > > >>> -> Looks good. > > >>> Here's the exact same spec run with rspec-2.0.0.beta.13 and > >>> rails-3.0.0.beta4: > > >>> Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 0 > >>> Challenges count: 0 > >>> Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 1 > >>> Challenges count: 1 > >>> .Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 1 > >>> Challenges count: 2 > >>> Before Each: > >>> Featured Challenges size: 2 > >>> Challenges count: 3 > > >>> So apparently the latest rspec doesn't clean up after examples at all? > > >>> Is this a bug or a feature? > > >> Bug, but please check if it's still true of beta.14.1. > > > Hey David, > > > I just tried it out using the latest rspec and rspec-rails: > > > Gemfile: > > > gem 'rspec', '2.0.0.beta.14' > > gem 'rspec-rails', '2.0.0.beta.14.1 > > > $ bundle show rspec > > ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-2.0.0.beta.14 > > > $bundle show rspec-rails > > ~/.bundle/ruby/1.8/gems/rspec-rails-2.0.0.beta.14.1 > > > Unfortunately, the bug still exists when using this configuration: > > > Before Each: > > Featured Challenges size: 0 > > Challenges count: 0 > > .Before Each: > > Featured Challenges size: 1 > > Challenges count: 1 > > .Before Each: > > Featured Challenges size: 1 > > Challenges count: 2 > > FBefore Each: > > Featured Challenges size: 2 > > Challenges count: 3 > > What's in your Gemfile and spec/spec_helper.rb? > > ps - please post in-line or at the bottom so we can follow the thread. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
