El 19/07/2010, a las 16:20, Phillip Koebbe escribió:
> On 2010-07-19 5:38 AM, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
>> I don't necessarily think so. Matt says you can probably do this right now
>> by using macros. I don't actually know what he means by that, but I do know
>> that there are cases where I sometimes want a bunch of nearly identical
>> specs, and I generate them in code using enumeration or some other means;
>> ie. dumb example:
>>
>> [:foo, :bar, :baz].do |thing|
>> describe "#{thing} dimensions" do
>> it 'has length' do
>> thing.to_s.length.should> 0
>> end
>> end
>> end
>>
>
> Glad to see I'm not the only one that does this. :)
Yeah, I think it's a legitimate technique, as long as you don't get too carried
away with it.
I use it, for example, for some code quality specs:
Wincent::SOURCE_FILES.each do |file|
describe file do
it 'contains no trailing whitespace' do
file.should_not have_trailing_whitespace
end
it 'contains no tabs' do
file.should_not contain_tabs
end
it 'has a newline at the end' do
file.should have_newline_at_end_of_file
end
end
end
Cheers,
Wincent
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
