On Jul 23, 2010, at 8:57 am, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > Recently commited (RSpec 2.0.0.beta.18) was the ability to pass a block to > "it_should_behave_like", making the relation clearer; eg: > > describe MyStruct do > it_should_behave_like 'a Struct' do > let(:struct) { MyStruct.new } > end > end > > I did ask about parametrizing that explicitly via metadata, but David feels > that the block based approach is better; see the full thread here: > > http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/71
And I only just tweeted about that ticket too! I didn't review it all though, I just saw the aliasing (which I currently do by hand). That's in beta 18 then? Pretty sure I just got that when I updated this morning. Will play around with it later... Cheers Ash -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users