I may be the only one who finds this useful, but I think there's value in evaluating the customization block after the shared example group block. It allows the shared example group to provide a default implementation of a helper method, and then an instance of the shared behavior to override the helper method if appropriate. If you evaluate the customization block before the shared example group block, the default implementation wins out, and you have no way to override helper methods in an instance of a shared example group.
On Jul 30, 2:58 pm, Ashley Moran <ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk> wrote: > On 30 Jul 2010, at 5:00 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > By all means. > > I've started on that and filed a ticket[1]. > > One question I have, is I keep calling the Example Group that uses a shared > block the "host group". Is there already a name for it? I never know what > to use, and I'm not sure "host group" describes it accurately anyway. > > Cheers > Ash > > [1]http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/issues/issue/99 > > --http://www.patchspace.co.uk/http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
