On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:37 AM, narwen wrote: > I'm wondering what is the elegant way to say to rspec to use capybara > instead of webrat. Also, I'm not using cucumber. > > My project is using: > > rails (3.0.0.rc) > rspec (2.0.0.beta.19) > capybara (0.3.9) > > I had success creating a file: spec/support/capybara.rb > > require 'capybara' > require 'capybara/dsl' > require 'capybara/rails' > > RSpec.configure do |config| > config.include Capybara > end > > Is there a better way to say to rspec to use capybara?
In beta 20 you'll just need to add it to your Gemfile. See http://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/issues/closed/#issue/49 > []'s > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
