On Aug 24, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Phillip Koebbe wrote:
> I am trying to use Bundler on a Rails 2.3.8 project and am having a problem
> when trying to run my specs. This application was on 2.3.5 until yesterday,
> and I switched it to 2.3.8 and all specs passed. But after adding Bundler
> (0.9.26),
Bundler-1.0 is in the release candidate phase now, and is far superior to 0.9.
I would not waste my time with 0.9 if I were you. Might even avoid this problem.
HTH,
David
> rake spec fails because (it appears) files in config/initializers aren't
> being loaded. Yet the application works when running script/server.
>
> When I issue
>
> $ rake spec
>
> I get
>
> uninitialized constant Web::BaseHelper::AuthenticationMethods (NameError)
>
> because of
>
> module Web::BaseHelper
> include AuthenticationMethods
> ...
> end
>
> where AuthenticationMethods is defined in
> config/initializers/authentication_methods.rb. If I change web/base_helper.rb
> to
>
> require "#{Rails.root}/config/initializers/authentication_methods" unless
> defined? AuthenticationMethods
>
> module Web::BaseHelper
> include AuthenticationMethods
> ...
> end
>
> the error is no longer reported.
>
> I added Bundler by following the instructions at the Bundler page[1].
> I have also tried $ bundle exec rake spec, with the same result.
> I have been searching Google all morning without finding a resolution.
> I am using rspec 1.3.0 / rspec-rails 1.3.2, even before adding Bundler.
> This is on Mac OS X 10.6.4 and ruby 1.8.7-p174 (Snow Leopard stock).
>
> I read Rick DeNatale's post[2] regarding Bundler, rspec, and rake, and while
> I haven't made the changes he describes, I did try forcing the environment by
>
> $ rake spec RAILS_ENV=test
>
> with the same result. I didn't incorporate Rick's changes yet because I
> wanted to check here first to see if there is any other information available.
>
> Can anyone offer insight, words of wisdom, encouragement, or a solution? If
> this isn't a problem specific to rspec, I apologize. I was trying to think of
> some way to test something else, but the few things that came to mind
> succeeded (well, didn't generate any errors anyway).
>
> Thanks,
> Phillip
>
> [1] http://gembundler.com/rails23.html
> [2]
> http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/2010/06/25/making-rspec-rake-and-bundler-play-well-together
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
