> I suppose I need to be careful that the attribute change was rejected > for some other reason (bad data, for example). But that's true of any > example/test.
Good catch, that's why I think the Shoulda approach makes sense (since otherwise you're duplicating the Rails test suite which is supposed to specify/exercise that functionality already) _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
