On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Jim Morris wrote: > Sorry I may have been unclear.... > > When using the default spec_helper as generated from a fresh > script/rails generate rspec:install > I get the error... > > undefined method `last_response' for > #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_2:0x9da18cc> > > This means something is not seeing the Rack Test stuff. > > The second error is got when I add > > include Rack::Test::Methods > > It now sees last_response but doesn't get a respnose from visit (That > may be a different errror). > > So bottom line is using the latest rails/rspec/webrat does not work > out of the box.
It does for me, so something is different between our configurations. Do you have webrat in the Gemfile? Is this a controller spec? If so is it in the spec/controllers directory? > > On Nov 29, 7:18 am, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2010, at 4:58 AM, Jim Morris wrote: >> >> >> >>> Ok adding >> >>> include Rack::Test::Methods >> >>> to my spec_helper changed the error to >> >>> Failure/Error: visit "/" >>> No response yet. Request a page first. >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rack- >>> test-0.5.6/lib/rack/mock_session.rb:51:in `last_response' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/adapters/rack.rb:26:in `response' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/adapters/rack.rb:14:in `response_body' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:176:in `exception_caught?' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:121:in `request_page' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/session.rb:217:in `visit' >>> # /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.02/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ >>> webrat-0.7.2/lib/webrat/core/methods.rb:7:in `visit' >>> # ./spec/requests/basics_spec.rb:5 >> >>> So someone is not including the rack test stuff, however still don;t >>> know why it is failing >> >> I'd get rid of all of that stuff from spec_helper. It was guidance from a >> cucumber-rails issue, not an rspec issue, and is unnecessary with rspec. I'd >> just re-generate it with "script/rails generate rspec:install" >> >> HTH, >> David >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Nov 15, 3:36 pm, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Nov 15, 2010, at 4:51 PM, Peter Havens wrote: >> >>>>> I'm having problems getting rspec-rails 2 request specs to work with >>>>> webrat. Any help would be appreciated. Here's my setup: >> >>>>> ruby 1.9.2p0 >>>>> rails 3.0.1 >>>>> rspec-rails 2.1.0 >>>>> webrat0.7.2 >> >>>>> Here's the error I'm getting: >> >>>>> $ rspec --backtrace spec/requests/ssl_certificate_requests_spec.rb >>>>> F >> >>>>> Failures: >>>>> 1) <text> >>>>> Failure/Error: Unable to find matching line from backtrace >>>>> stack level too deep >>>>> # /opt/local/lib/ruby1.9/1.9.1/forwardable.rb:185 >> >>>>> Finished in 0.49825 seconds >>>>> 1 example, 1 failure >> >>>>> Here are snippets of my files: >> >>>>> # spec/spec_helper.rb >>>>> # >>>>> # The following is based on some tips from a cucumber-rails ticket: >>>>> require "webrat" >>>>> require "webrat/core/matchers" >> >>>>> include Rack::Test::Methods >>>>> includeWebrat::Methods >>>>> includeWebrat::Matchers >> >>>>> Webrat.configure do |config| >>>>> config.mode = :rack >>>>> config.open_error_files = false >>>>> end >> >>>>> # spec/requests/<file>_spec.rb >>>>> require "spec_helper" >> >>>>> describe "<text>" do >>>>> it "<text>" do >>>>> visit <text>_path >> >>>>> # The following works when uncommented: >>>>> # >>>>> # get <text>_path >>>>> # assert_template '<text>/<text>' >>>>> end >>>>> end >> >>>> This is actually awebratissue, but it is reported to rspec-rails andwebrat: >> >>>> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/issues/140https://webrat.lightho... >> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Pete >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>>> rspec-us...@rubyforge.org >>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rspec-users mailing list >>> rspec-us...@rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-us...@rubyforge.orghttp://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
