Yeah, unfortunately I'm not receiving too much feedback about it for now, so, I'm just using for myself and trying to make it better. I will try to spread more and more the idea, so make more people wanna try it, its a different concept and I mean people still a little afraid to try it. But I will keep going on it, I really believe in the idea :)
Thanks --- Wilker Lúcio http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio Kajabi Consultant +55 81 82556600 On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:12 PM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Jan 18, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Wilker wrote: > > David > > Also, will be nice if in the future you and other mock frameworks authors > support some kind of reflection on defined doubles (or even better, I can > define an "Aidmock support guideline" to you implement support by > yourselves). If you take a look at current RSpec Mocks driver on Aidmock[1] > you will see that I need to use a lot of "instance_variable_get" to > accomplish the work, and it has a serious risk to broke in any rspec-mocks > update... > > WDYT? > > > I'd be willing to do that in the long run, but I'd want to see how aidmock > shapes up in terms of acceptance and usage first. The last thing I want in > rspec is a bunch of extra code that nobody is using. > > [1] > https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock/blob/master/lib/aidmock/frameworks/rspec.rb > --- > Wilker Lúcio > http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio > Kajabi Consultant > +55 81 82556600 > > > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Wilker <wilkerlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dave, I just updated the gem and documentation, now supporting >> constrained_to on mocks :) >> >> You have any other suggestions for now? >> >> --- >> Wilker Lúcio >> http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio >> Kajabi Consultant >> +55 81 82556600 >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Wilker <wilkerlu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> You are right Dave, >>> >>> I was thinking about it, but with a different interface, like: >>> >>> Aidmock.double(Interface) >>> >>> but I mean your is cooler, and user will be able to apply mocks/stubs >>> directly >>> >>> I will work on it today :) >>> >>> Thanks >>> --- >>> Wilker Lúcio >>> http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio >>> Kajabi Consultant >>> +55 81 82556600 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 1:45 AM, David Chelimsky >>> <dchelim...@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On Jan 16, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wilker wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi guys, >>>> >>>> I launched some days ago a new project that aims to make the use of >>>> mocks >>>> safer. >>>> This is the URL of project: https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock >>>> >>>> The basic idea is to make user define interfaces of classes, when user >>>> defines the class interface (which is something like defining method >>>> signatures on C or Java) Aidmock automatic generate some sanity check >>>> specs, these specs will verify if class has the method defined, and if >>>> it respect arity of interface. >>>> >>>> And more important, when user create mocks while developing specs, it >>>> will verify all defined mocks, and check if they are respecting >>>> defined interface. >>>> >>>> You can saw more about project motivation here(with some example of >>>> why it exists): https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock/wiki/Motivation >>>> >>>> This project is a kind of experimental one, with a different idea, and >>>> any feedback will be really welcome. >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Wilker, >>>> >>>> There have been numerous requests for a tool that would warn when >>>> mocking method that don't exist, and I think it is great that you are >>>> working on aidmock. >>>> >>>> In the Motivation wiki page, you say that you recommend using real >>>> objects instead of mocks in all cases. I don't agree with this, as an >>>> important basis for mock objects is the idea that we should mock roles, not >>>> objects [1]. >>>> >>>> I imagine that aidmock could work equally well with real objects and >>>> mock objects if there were a hook to tell a mock what interfaces it is >>>> allowed to stub. Something like: >>>> >>>> account = double('account').constrained_to(MyInterface) >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>>> >>>> [1] http://static.mockobjects.com/files/mockrolesnotobjects.pdf >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rspec-users mailing list >>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>>> >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
