On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Luis Lavena <luislav...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> I think the right thing to do is to rely on the autotest plugin, but I also >> think that this would require a 3.0 release, which feels a bit grand for >> this situation. My question to you is: do you think this warrants a major >> (3.0) release, or would it be an acceptable exception to the rule (assuming >> proper fanfare and documentation)? >> > > IMHO this case is a exception to the rule that we can live with.
Luis, you're one of those early adopter types, aren't you :) I'd like to spend some time establishing the rule before making exceptions. Per other post this thread, I think I've got a workable solution in place for the rspec-2.5 release. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
