On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Salmerón Amselem <
daniel.amse...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, I'll try that. I just have the feeling ActiveRecord caches are
> being a pain in the ass. For example, the toggle_resource method removes or
> adds a resource to a group, and when just after that I check the resources
> on that group, I still get the same ones before the toggle_resource method
> was called. I had to change "self.resources" to "self.resources.all" in
> order to force Activerecord to update the cache.
>
> Is there any way I can test this weird behavior? I would love if I could
> understand better the way ARel works.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Justin Ko <jko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Daniel Salmeron Amselem <
>> daniel.amse...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to test this with Ruby 1.9.2, RSpec 2.5.0, and Rails 3.0.4:
>>>
>>>   context "toggle_resource method" do
>>>     it "should remove the resource from the group" do
>>>       group = Factory(:unique_group)
>>>       user = Factory(:unique_user, :account => group.account)
>>>
>>>       group.add_resource(user)
>>>       group.reload
>>>       group.should have(1).users
>>>
>>>       group.toggle_resource(user)
>>>       group.reload
>>>       group.should have(0).users
>>>     end
>>>   end
>>>
>>> and I had to add 'group.reload' in order to make this thing work. I would
>>> appreciate if anyone could explain to me why do I need to do it, and why I
>>> can't see a message that it's in the model, something like the following:
>>>
>>>   def add_resource(resource)
>>>     p "HEY"
>>>     GroupResource.create(:resource => resource, :group => self)
>>>   end
>>>
>>> The message "HEY" doesn't appear in the console after running 'rspec
>>> spec/models/group_spec.rb'. Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rspec-users mailing list
>>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>>
>>
>> You have to call "reload" to clear activerecord caches. Destroying an
>> associated record does not affect the cache.
>>
>> One way you could write your spec is like this:
>>
>> expect { group.add_resource(user) }.to change(group, :users).by(1)
>> expect { group.toggle_resource(user) }.to change(group, :users).by(-1)
>>
>> Let us know if that works for you. Thanks.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "rspec" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rs...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rspec+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rspec?hl=en.
>>
>>
>>
>

You can call "self.resources.reload" rather than "self.resources.all". As
far testing those methods, the "expect { }.to change().by()" functionality
should do the trick. Let us know if it works or not.
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to