2011/3/15 David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>
> On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Magnus Erickson wrote:
>
>
> 2011/3/13 David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>
>
>> On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Magnus Erickson wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > Is there a way to detect if an example has failed? Something like a:
>> "example_failed?" method.
>> > In my case I need to dump some information, i.e trace and error log, to
>> be used when analyzing what
>> > went wrong in the example. I'm thinking about putting it in a
>> after(:each) {}.
>>
>> after(:each) won't work because failures aren't actually reported out
>> until all of the after hooks are processed.
>>
>> Your best bet is a custom formatter. See:
>>
>>
>> http://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-5/dir/formatters/custom-formatters
>> http://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-5/dir/command-line/format-option
>>
>> HTH,
>> David
>>
>>
> Thanks for the answer David!
>
> It can be done via a custom formatter but then flexibility will be lost as
> well as visibility.
> It would really be handy to have this feature. Is there any other way of
> doing it? Is it possible to
> patch into RSpec in any way? What about after(:each).failure as a new
> feature in RSpec?
>
> BR
> Magnus
>
>
> > What do you mean by "flexibility will be lost"?
>
> > Also, please bottom-post (or inline-post) instead of top-posting [1],
> especially if that has already been established for the conversation.
>
> > Cheers,
> > David
>
>
Hi!
If having the option to ask if a fault has occurred in a scenario, the
measure to be taken upon detection is visible ie. in the spec file and the
action can be tailored depending on whats on
test. That's what I mean with flexibility.
Cheers
Magnus
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
