On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Radhesh Kamath <li...@ruby-forum.com>wrote:
> Justin Ko wrote in post #988825: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Radhesh Kamath > > <li...@ruby-forum.com>wrote: > > > >> end > >> > >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org > >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > >> > > > > > > You're mapping absolute strings (URL's) to your routes. Any string > > manipulation would dilute the spec. In my opinion, this is not a case of > > keeping things DRY. > > It's clear that you have understood my intent: keep things DRY by > specifying the prefix once, and write tests as though the prefix is > implicitly specified. > > But what do you mean by 'dilute the spec'? > Do you think it might make the spec brittle? > Routes are basically constants. By breaking this constant up (the string) in your spec, the value drops (because of clarity), in my opinion. > > Pat: > > I just want to keep things DRY by specifying the 'v1' prefix once, so > the example would be 'v1/...', only 'v1' would be implicitly set in some > way. > > Best, > Radhesh > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
