On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:10 AM, Jarmo Pertman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We tried to upgrade our RSpec from 1.3.1 to 2.6 and are having some
> problems. It seems that shared example group includes modules
> differently in RSpec 2.
>
> Consider the following code:
> module MyModule
> def testing
> end
> end
>
> shared_examples_for "shared" do
> include MyModule
>
> it "works" do
> testing
> end
> end
>
> describe "describe" do
> it_should_behave_like "shared"
>
> it "works too" do
> testing
> end
> end
>
> When running with RSpec 1.3.1 all specs are passing, but RSpec 2.6
> fails with one failure:
> 1) describe works too
> Failure/Error: testing
> NameError:
> undefined local variable or method `testing' for
> #<RSpec::Core::ExampleGroup::Nested_1:0x47edee0 @example=nil>
> # ./spec/blah/blah_spec.rb:18
>
> It seems that the describe block doesn't get the methods included from
> the module. How to solve that problem?
This has been through a bit of churn, but here is the short version:
it_should_behave_like creates (and wraps) a nested group, but there is are also
two new include_context/include_examples methods. Your choices are:
describe "describe" do
it_should_behave_like "shared" do
it "works too" do
testing
end
end
end
describe "describe" do
include_context "shared"
it "works too" do
testing
end
end
describe "describe" do
include_examples "shared"
it "works too" do
testing
end
end
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
