On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 9:20 AM, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>wrote: > > Hey Tyson, > > I hate to be the bearer of "you can already do that", but, you can already > do that (as of rspec-core-2.6) > > http://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/dir/example-groups/shared-context > https://gist.github.com/1009111 > > The only difference that I see is the use of the term 'scenario', which > could be resolved with a couple of aliases. > > WDYT? >
I've no idea how I missed that! I swear I looked through the docs to see if it was something I could already do. In any case, our main spec suite still runs under RSpec 1 (there's a few dependencies keeping us from upgrading), so it's still useful for us. The only other difference I can see is the "setup_for" sugar, but that's something that could easily be added on top of shared_context. I'll dig into that. Thanks for the tip! -Tyson -- *CrowdFlower <http://crowdflower.com/> @ *2111 Mission St, Suite 302, San Francisco, CA 94110
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
