Apologies for not noticing this -- I did search, but I wasn't sure
exactly how to phrase it. Thanks for the info, David.

~ jf
--
John Feminella
Principal Consultant, BitsBuilder
LI: http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnxf
SO: http://stackoverflow.com/users/75170/



On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 16:05, David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 2:32 PM, John Feminella wrote:
>
>> Right now, #stub stubs a method even if it doesn't exist. Is there a
>> way to stub a method on an object, if and only if it already
>> #responds_to? that method? It would also be good if it raised an
>> ArgumentError or the like.
>>
>> Example:
>>
>> # this is how it works now:
>> #   - stubs the #bar method even if it doesn't exist
>> #   - always returns 'baz'
>> foo.stub(:bar).and_return('baz')
>>
>> What I'd like is something like this:
>>
>> # raise ArgumentError unless foo.respond_to? :bar
>> # otherwise, behaves as the regular #stub does
>> foo.stub!(:bar).and_return('baz')
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> This has come up many times before. Please check out 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rspec/browse_thread/thread/c344c898c278cd2b 
> and https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/15 to see where the 
> conversation is at this point.
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to