I recently saw a test passing when it should have failed, because the
person who wrote it used should_not_receive instead of
should_receive. Here is a simple example illustrating the behavior:
class MyTest
def foo
puts "hey"
end
def bar
foo
end
end
describe MyTest do
it "passes but should fail" do
subject.should_not_receive(:foo).once
subject.bar
end
end
If I remove the ".once" the test fails, as I would expect.
Is this intended behavior? It seems really weird to me.
I am seeing this with rspec 1.3.2 and rspec-rails 1.3.4.
Thanks,
David
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
