On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <lboc...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Em 09-12-2011 15:43, David Chelimsky escreveu: > >> On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<lboc...@yahoo.com.br> >> wrote: >> >>> Em 09-12-2011 15:14, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas escreveu: >>>> >>>> While running some specs of a new fresh Rails 3.1 project with latest >>>> Rspec, I'm getting some strange time reporting (using --drb and spork): >>>> >>>> Finished in 731.67 seconds >>>> 10 examples, 0 failures >>>> >>>> But it actually run "time rake" in less than 2s. "time rspec" runs in >>>> about 0.2s. >>> >>> Yeah, but "time rspec" doesn't run any specs at all ;) "time rspec spec" >>> finishes in about 0.4s. Sorry... >> >> "time rspec" actually does run specs as of 2.7 > > > I'm using 2.7.1
I mis-spoke - it's 2.8 (which is out as an rc: 2.8.0.rc1). > here and the result of runnin rspec without specifying the > spec folder is: > > No examples found. > > > Finished in 5863.55 seconds > 0 examples, 0 failures > > Ignore the strange time since this is some issue with Spork that I still > don't know how to fix... > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
