On 3 February 2012 00:06, Lille <lille.pengu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I use these commands from the application root
>
> rspec spec
> rspec spec/controllers
>
> I get errors (an example will be shown below) for every controller
> test in my subdirectory spec/controllers/api/beta, where the
> controller namespacing is carried over in any test as follows
>
> describe Api::Beta1::ThingController ...
>
> Somehow, I do NOT get any errors for the tests in the subdirectory
> when I run this command from the application root
>
> rspec spec/controllers/api/beta
>
> Here is an example of the error I get, with backtrace:
>
> 23) Api::Beta1::ThingController#loan server-side failure should have
> status code 500 and expected message body
> Failure/Error: response = post(action, params)
> ActionController::RoutingError:
> No route matches {:controller=>"api/beta1/
> thing", :action=>"loan"}
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:464:in
> `raise_routing_error'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:460:in
> `rescue in generate'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:452:in
> `generate'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:493:in
> `generate'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:489:in
> `generate_extras'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb:485:in
> `extra_keys'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb:145:in
> `assign_parameters'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb:438:in `process'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb:49:in `process'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/
> actionpack-3.1.0/lib/action_controller/test_case.rb:370:in `post'
> # ./spec/controllers/api/beta1/thing_controller_spec.rb:72:in
> `raw_post'
> # ./spec/controllers/api/beta1/thing_controller_spec.rb:57:in
> `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:35:in `instance_eval'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:35:in `run_in'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:70:in `block in run_all'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:70:in `each'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:70:in `run_all'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/hooks.rb:116:in `run_hook'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:221:in `block in
> eval_before_eachs'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:221:in `each'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:221:in `eval_before_eachs'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:145:in `run_before_each'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:47:in `block in run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:107:in `with_around_hooks'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example.rb:45:in `run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:294:in `block in
> run_examples'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:290:in `map'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:290:in `run_examples'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:262:in `run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:263:in `block in run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:263:in `map'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:263:in `run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in `block (2 levels) in
> run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in `map'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:24:in `block in run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/reporter.rb:12:in `report'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:21:in `run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:80:in `run_in_process'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:69:in `run'
> # /Users/lille/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rails310/gems/rspec-
> core-2.6.4/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:11:in `block in autorun'
>
> I missed this issue when developing my tests, because I was running
> them using the command that succeeds. Now, I'm in trouble because I
> want to step back and test everything with a simple command from the
> app root:
>
> rpsec spec
>
> (Sorry to any bothered readers for any undue brevity in the previous
> post-response cycle, but I've assumed that the type of error
> (RoutingError) in combination with the way rspec works and fails for
> my functional tests was adequate to suggest a fix.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lille
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
Just a wild guess here, but shouldn't the folder match the namespace, you
have a beta folder and a Beta1 namespace
--
------------------------
Andrew Premdas
blog.andrew.premdas.org
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
