+1 I've often wondered if there is a better way to stub this situation.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Ken Chien <ken.ch...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Justin, > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Justin Ko <jko...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Would you like to do this? >> >> account.should_receive_chain(:users, :active, :first) >> >> > I would love this syntax. I find that I usually resort to stub_chain and > lose the ability to check that the object received a particular message. > > > >> Note, this would *not* be part of RSpec, but rather a separate gem. >> >> Would this alleviate any pain for you? >> > > Why can't it be a part of RSpec? Regardless, it would be a nice addition > to my specs. > > Regards, > Ken > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Tim Gremore 920 471-1716
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
