On 7 Mar 2012, at 18:16, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Matt Wynne <m...@mattwynne.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 7 Mar 2012, at 11:39, Morten Møller Riis wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm spec'ing a method that yields a value. Right now, I spec it like this:
>>
>> result = nil
>> thing.do_stuff { |value| result = value }
>> result.should == expected
>>
>> This feels like too much ceremony. What I want to do is something more this:
>>
>> thing.do_stuff.should yield_value(expected)
>>
>> Is there anything built into RSpec to let me do this? If not, how do other
>> people test yields?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Matt
>>
>>
>> How about this?
>>
>> thing.do_stuff(&:to_s).should == expected
>>
>>
>> Yes, that's a neat hack, but I'd prefer to be able to assert on the actual
>> yielded value, instead of the result of calling an arbitrary method on it.
>
> thing.do_stuff(&:self) would be a bit less arbitrary :)
It would, but does it work?
I assumed it would too but here on my Ruby 1.9.2 it gives me a NoMethodError :(
cheers,
Matt
--
Freelance programmer & coach
Author, http://pragprog.com/book/hwcuc/the-cucumber-book
Founder, http://www.relishapp.com/
Twitter, https://twitter.com/mattwynne
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
