On 27-Jul-2012, at 11:34 AM, Bas Vodde wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How about:
>
> Message.should_receive(:Message.method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true)
I think that ought to be:
Message.should_receive(:method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true)
>
> Bas
>
> On 27-Jul-2012, at 1:31 PM, bill gate wrote:
>
>> Hi, I have two model: Message, User
>>
>> message.rb
>> ```
>> class Message < ActiveRecord::Base
>> class << self
>> def method_a(args)
>> [1,2]
>> end
>> end
>> end
>> ```
>>
>> user.rb
>> ```
>> class User < ActiveRecord::Base
>> def method_user
>> if Message.method_a('anythings')
>> #... some code
>> end
>> end
>> end
>> ```
>> I want to test method_user,but I don't want to test Message#method_a
>> How I can mock Message with method_a?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
I think the thing people don't usually realise is classes in Ruby are also
objects in their own right. So, whatever you can do to any other object, you
can do to a class.
Thanks,
Srushti
http://c42.in
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
