On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Alexander Baronec <abo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2012/8/6 David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Alexander Baronec <abo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 2012/8/5 David Chelimsky <dchelim...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Alexander Baronec <abo...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hello.
>> >> > How can I test object to receive message and compare arguments of
>> >> > this
>> >> > message with value evaluated at present time? It is possible?
>> >> >
>> >> > For example:
>> >> >
>> >> > should_receive(:api_send).with( -> { players.count } ) And
>> >> > players.count
>> >> > will be called and evaluated only when api_send is received.
>> >>
>> >> Look at Fake Implementation on
>> >> https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/2-11/docs/method-stubs.
>> >> You can do the same thing w/ should_receive, e.g.
>> >>
>> >> foo.should_receive(:api_send) do |player_count|
>> >> player_count.should eq players.count
>> >> end
>> >>
>> >> HTH,
>> >> David
>>
>> > It don't work when object received few messages. I described it there:
>> >
>> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11669979/should-recieve-alongside-other-messages
>>
>> should_receive, by default, expects exactly one call, but there are a
>> number of ways for you to specify more than one call. One possibility
>> would be:
>>
>> foo.should_receive(:api_send).ordered
>> foo.should_receive(:api_send).with(2).ordered
>>
>> See http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-mocks for more info
> I wan't to test order of received messages. I want to test only one message
> of few and compare it with real-time value.
> It's not possible?
It is, but you have to specify which time it should care if you're
going to compare it to a real time value.
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
