On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:52 AM, J. B. Rainsberger <m...@jbrains.ca> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Bas Vodde <b...@odd-e.com> wrote: >> >> >> JB is right. >> >> Sometimes, for clarity, it is useful to add should_not, but for >> functionality it is usually not needed. > > > I know JMock has never() for this people. Should RSpec-mocks have something > like object.should_receive(:nothing).
never() is not a catch all for _all_ messages. It is for a specific message, just like it is in rspec-mocks # rspec object.should_receive(:msg).never #jmock never(object).msg() > -- > J. B. (Joe) Rainsberger :: http://www.jbrains.ca :: > http://blog.thecodewhisperer.com > Author, JUnit Recipes > Free Your Mind to Do Great Work :: http://www.freeyourmind-dogreatwork.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
