The the rspec-expectations documentation (http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-expectations/frames #4.2) says:
The one-liner syntax supported by rspec-core<http://rubydoc.info/gems/rspec-core> uses should even when config.syntax = :expect. It reads better than the alternative, and does not require a global monkey patch: describe User do it { should validate_presence_of :email } end The expect-syntax works, but the One-Liner-Syntax does NOT work out of the box. Do I have to activate the "shoulda gem" form thougtbot? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rspec/-/7nNVcfwuWbIJ. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
