Onward!
Eliot On 17.12.2024 18:16, Paul Hoffman wrote:
Yep, we like talking about things that can be improved with the RFC series. The
(thankfully short) WG charter says:
The RFC Series Working Group (RSWG) is the primary venue in which members
of
the community collaborate regarding the policies that govern the RFC
Series.
There was a thread started by the WG chairs on 2024-10-30, but never concluded,
about what is policy and what is operations. Most of the comments on this
errata thread are about operations of the errata process, not the policy for
how errata apply to RFCs.
I propose that the WG chairs definitively close out the "Operational vs.
policy" thread so that the WG can move forward on the many drafts we already have.
If the conclusion of that thread makes it clear that errata operations is in scope for
this WG, I propose the WG officially adopt draft-farrell-errata; otherwise, I propose
that Someone create a mailing list to discuss errata operations and this discussion move
there.
--Paul Hoffman
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
