Greetings again. As you can see, we now have an adopted WG document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates/
Please review it for anything you think should be removed or changed, or things that should be added. For everything on that list, please start a new thread with an appropriate subject. Two notes: - Section 6, "Processing Drafts from the RSWG", is an obvious placeholder. I'll start a new thread immediately with the hopes that one or more of you want to contribute text. - There was some interest in this document being a full bis of RFC 9280, meaning that RFC 9280 would be replicated with the changes from this document added to it (with some good callouts for the changes). Others didn't like that idea so much. Let's wait for another round or two of this draft before we decide whether to do the conversion. And, before anyone says "that's too much work": no, it isn't. Mechanically prepping a copy of 9280 to be reissued took about an hour (with loud music and only a few swear words aimed at the tools). --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
