> On 13 Mar 2025, at 12:40, Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025, at 10:33, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> a) People generally agree that we should indicate obsolescence and >> historic status on RFCs >> b) The metadata near the top of the definitive format for an RFC can >> change if that RFC is made obsolete or historic >> c) All the publication formats will be regenerated when (b) happens >> d) The indicator of the status change will be at or near the top of the >> regenerated publication formats > > I like this formulation better. For one, it requires less of a fundamental > change to how the revision is produced relative to the original.
Works for me too. Thanks. Jay -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director exec-direc...@ietf.org -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
