Hi,

I have compared this draft not with the -00 version, but with RFC 9280 itself. 
(This is easy to do with https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff, entering 
'rfc9280' as the first document name and 
'draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-01' as the second document name.)

Firstly, many thanks to the authors because the old/new comparison is 
beautifully clear.

My considered opinion is that this in very good shape. I would be happy if we 
immediately update it again to Obsoletes: 9280. At this stage, I think the 
detailed explanations in sections 1.2-1.5 should be moved to an Appendix. 
Section 1.6 should stay where it is.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 25-Mar-25 05:38, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Internet-Draft draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-01.txt is now available.
It is a work item of the RFC Series Working Group (RSWG) Editorial Stream
Working Group of the IETF.

    Title:   RFC Editor Model
    Authors: Paul Hoffman
             Alexis Rossi
    Name:    draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-01.txt
    Pages:   41
    Dates:   2025-03-24

Abstract:

    This document specifies version 3 of the RFC Editor Model.  The model
    defines two high-level tasks related to the RFC Series.  First,
    policy definition is the joint responsibility of the RFC Series
    Working Group (RSWG), which produces policy proposals, and the RFC
    Series Approval Board (RSAB), which approves such proposals.  Second,
    policy implementation is primarily the responsibility of the RFC
    Production Center (RPC) as contractually overseen by the IETF
    Administration Limited Liability Company (IETF LLC).  In addition,
    various responsibilities of the RFC Editor function are now performed
    alone or in combination by the RSWG, RSAB, RPC, RFC Series Consulting
    Editor (RSCE), and IETF LLC.  Finally, this document establishes the
    Editorial Stream for publication of future policy definition
    documents produced through the processes defined herein.

    Since the publication of RFC 9280, lessons have been learned about
    implementing this model.  This document lists some of those lessons
    learned and updates RFC 9280 based on that experience.

    This document updates RFCs 7990, 7991, 7992, 7993, 7994, 7995, 7996,
    7997.  This document also updates RFC 9280 itself.

    This draft is part of the RFC Series Working Group (RSWG); see
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/documents/
    (https://datatracker.ietf.org/edwg/rswg/documents/).  There is a
    repository for this draft at https://github.com/
    paulehoffman/9280-updates (https://github.com/
    paulehoffman/9280-updates).

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates/

There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-01

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-editorial-rswg-rfc9280-updates-01

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts



--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to