Alexis:
I have a concern with this sentence in Section 2:
Normative descriptions of protocols,
systems, etc. must be fully represented in the text of the RFC,
and must not be contingent on comprehension of any SVG.
This is a MUST statement, but the use of "etc." makes it very vague.
In addition, It seems to be saying the same thing as the previous sentence/
Also in Section 2:
* SVGs must remain static after publication of the RFC, so there may
be interactive, multimedia, or other elements that cannot be used.
I think we need clarity on "cannot be used". I think you mean that these
features of SVG cannot be included in the SVG.
Russ
> On May 1, 2025, at 1:38 PM, Alexis Rossi <alexisrossir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We believe that draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs-00 is ready for Working Group
> Last Call.
>
> The draft can be found at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs/
>
> Thanks,
> Alexis
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
