Assuming no other last minute screams, let's go with that wording.
Alexis, if you can publish a new rev, I'll toss it over the wall to the
RSAB.
pr
On 12 Jun 2025, at 21:16, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Works for me.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 13-Jun-25 07:59, Eliot Lear wrote:
I'm good with all of what Martin wrote, but with one slight suggested
change:
On 12.06.2025 17:25, Martin Thomson wrote:
SVGs must not include animation or interactive features.
SVGs should include only limited reactive design elements (scaling,
dark/light mode, and perhaps minor adjustments to allow for
variations in display technology). The intent being to ensure that
how something is displayed does not substantially alter what is
seen.
Since this is intent, my suggestion is that we go a little higher
level and say "... alter the diagram's meaning", and drop the word
"substantially".
Eliot
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
