On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:23 AM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:17 AM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The draft is a little more aggressive than I expected, but I support it. >> The issue is that putting these matters at the top /might/ help someone >> seeing an RFC or I-D for the first time (I doubt it), but it's repeated for >> people who read more than one document. So, the more you participate, the >> more your attention is wasted. >> > > One might think it would be easy to learn to skip it. But at least I find > it annoying, because the front matter of a document varies in length. A > long abstract might push the boilerplate down, maybe the introduction is > not really the Introduction, etc. So, you're constantly scanning for the > boilerplate. > Sorry for 3 in a row, but I remembered these are already collapsed in "Editor's Copy" versions. Obviously, Martin knows this, but the draft does not make the point. But these Editors' Copies are still "Copyright (c) 2025 IETF Trust" and all that. thanks, Rob * Example: https://larseggert.github.io/draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes/draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes.html
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
