On Oct 15, 2025, at 12:15, John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote: > explicitly allow (and > request) the RPC to establish a list of scripts (and, where > applicable, languages) that they are ready to handle expeditiously.
The current draft currently allows them to do that. If you believe it does not, please point to the sentences that you think does not allow that so that the draft can be fixed. > It just seems to me that having the RPC identify what they can handle > well and easily (in some way I'm happy to have them work out) so that > document writers will know that other things may require some > additional time, expertise, and possible rewriting, or that > consulting the RPC while the writing work is still in progress would > be a good idea, would benefit everyone. We disagree here. There are *plenty* of non-i18n things that the RPC has a problem with handling well and easily. When a draft with those things comes in, the RPC learns how to handle them. i18n things are no different, except maybe to i18n experts. > And it would probably save > the RPC work rather than putting more burden on them. If that's actually the case (I'm skeptical), they can already do that within the wording of the draft. Again: if you really want this and you want support for your desire, please suggest specific text changes so the WG can evaluate them. --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
