On 15-Mar-26 13:19, Michael Richardson wrote:
Jean Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:
> There isn't a need to publish RFC 10000 as a test document because we
have a
> dedicated testing environment for the new queue management system and
> website.
The test is not really for the RPC, but the rest of the Internet :-)
Agreed, but although I can see scenarios where some individuals or secondary
RFC repositories might experience minor faults, I can't see any scenarios where
there would be serious repercussions.
I _do_ think it would be wise for the RPC to publicise the issue quite widely (not just
in the IETF/IRTF community): "Are you ready for RFC 10001?"
BTW, I wondered what an AI would make of all this:
https://chatgpt.com/share/69b60b6b-8c18-8002-81fa-a1a5ce1898aa
Brian
> And RFC 10000 couldn't be issued as an April 1 RFC because the new
> infrastructure won't yet be in place to support it.
Oh. Too bad.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
