Pete Resnick <[email protected]> wrote: > Since this document is in RSAB balloting, can I assume that this is a > comment for them? Are you asking for a change before the document gets > published? Or is this perhaps a comment to the RPC on implementing the > policy?
Honestly, I forgot when I reviewed it that it was RSAB who balloted, and not
me. I am happy with the document.
I trust the RPC to apply their discretion when implementing, and no change is
required.
>> I've read draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-11.txt and it seems fine to me.
>>
>> Noting that my txt rendering of it (in emacs) had no problem with the
>> example Yen and Euro symbols. Good example.
>>
>>> Company names and geographic names generally do not need Latin
>>> alternates, but they can be included at the discretion of the author
>>> and the RPC.
>>
>> I think that I'd like a Company name as part of an Affliation to have
>> a consistent alternate. I guess that really, I want to be able to
>> pattern match it against other entities to understand if two people
>> are affliated the same way.
>>
>> I don't know when a geographic name would be normative, but I guess
>> when it is key to understanding the document, the RPC and author will
>> apply discretion.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting
>> ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>
>> ** My working hours and your working hours may be different.
>> **
>> ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working
>> hours
>> **
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
** My working hours and your working hours may be different. **
** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
