Just to follow this up:My recommendation is a placeholder in the text to allow for circumscribing of where any differences are discovered. I think that turns into a simple table for working purposes, and then we can go through, streams and all, to see what variance is required, and to see where convergence can be found.
Again, the less variance, the better it is for the reader. Eliot On 05.06.2026 09:41, Eliot Lear wrote:
Brian,What we have is an untested claim that there is any sort of variation across the streams. The streams are well represented both here and in the RSAB. Please revert.Eliot On 05.06.2026 09:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:On 05-Jun-26 18:56, Eliot Lear wrote:On 05.06.2026 06:52, Brian E Carpenter wrote:Adjusted scope such that each stream may explicitly accept these guidelines and define exceptions and variationsThis vitiates the document. With that statement I see no point of publication.Well, we can debate that - it wasn't my original idea, as you know. Speaking for myself, I'd prefer s/may/should/. Or maybe s/may/is expected to/.Brian
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
