On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:36 PM Nathanael Ritz <[email protected]> wrote:
> […] it seems to me that many, many documents struggle with Security > Considerations despite many good reasons for it to be a requirement. > I would just add my point here is that it’s already challenging to get people to flesh out strong Security Considerations, despite my understanding that the community has a solid understanding as to why every RFC needs it. I don’t think the community would have the same broad understanding behind any mandatory AI disclosure requirements, in contrast. -N >
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
