> On Jun 3, 2026, at 3:04 AM, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> �_ Do we need to be clearer on what "incidental use" is?
>> I don't think so. There is judgment involved here, but whether math is
>> considered incidental to the purpose of a figure should become clear with
>> time. RPC policies might evolve to handle that better than this policy can.
Imagine a flowchart as a figure. Is "x > y" at a decision point in the
flowchart a incidental use of math? Based on the rest of the sentence I think
not. It requires that "any math content is only illustrative".
Russ
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
