Thanks much Eliot. I think the distinction you make is correct, and I'm
thinking about some restructuring of the draft to better separate out
principles. I'll also think about slides and we can discuss that off list.
Regards/Ngā mihi
Brian
On 12-Jun-26 17:15, Eliot Lear wrote:
I am happy to present the draft and lead a discussion. I would like, however,
to focus on the principles as applied to various aspects in the draft rather
than the text itself since the principles seem to be at issue.
Eliot
On 11 Jun 2026, at 23:55, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote:
Pete, everybody,
I will be at home in UTC+12 so it's unlikely I will be able to attend the
meeting unless there's a scheduling miracle.
Is there someone who is willing to present & advocate my draft, or even better
join as a co-author?
Regards/Ngā mihi
Brian Carpenter
On 11-Jun-26 19:51, Pete Resnick wrote:
So far for Vienna, we've got two main agenda items:
* draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics
o Question of adoption: Do we have the right scope, and is it in charter?
* draft-editorial-rswg-mathinrfcs
o https://github.com/alexisannerossi/id-mathinrfcs/pull/10
<https://github.com/alexisannerossi/id-mathinrfcs/pull/10>
Any other items that are hot or otherwise in need of face-to-face time?
Pete for Pete and Russ
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
