rswg  

Messages by Thread

• • [Rswg] Re: Doodle for RSWG in April 2026 Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
  • [Rswg] Re: Doodle for RSWG in April 2026 Russ Housley
  • [Rswg] Re: Doodle for RSWG in April 2026 Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
  • [Rswg] Re: Doodle for RSWG in April 2026 John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Doodle for RSWG in April 2026 Martin J . Dürst
• [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: March tools update Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: March tools update John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: March tools update IETF Executive Director
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Re: Re: March tools update Jean Mahoney
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Re: Re: March tools update Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: March tools update Toerless Eckert
  • [Rswg] Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Re: Re: March tools update Brian E Carpenter
• [Rswg] Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) RFC Series Approval Board via Datatracker
  • [Rswg] Re: Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) Tim Bray
  • [Rswg] Re: Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] Call for comments: <draft-rswg-rfc7997bis> (Text in RFCs) Alexis Rossi
• [Rswg] RFC Production Center report for March 2026 Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Salz, Rich
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Jean Mahoney
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Salz, Rich
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Jean Mahoney
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Salz, Rich
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Joel Halpern
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Jay Daley
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Joel Halpern
  • [Rswg] Re: Can an RFC be un-obsoleted? Michael Richardson
• [Rswg] 28 open issues Brian E Carpenter
• [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-09.txt internet-drafts
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-09.txt Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-09.txt Alexis Rossi
• [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-08.txt internet-drafts
• [Rswg] RFC 9920 on RFC Editor Model (Version 3) rfc-editor
• [Rswg] RFC Production Center report for February 2026 Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] Reappointment of Eliot Lear as Independent Submission Editor (ISE) IAB Executive Administrative Manager
• [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt internet-drafts
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Russ Housley
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-07.txt Pete Resnick
• [Rswg] "obsolete" tag related questions Toerless Eckert
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] "obsolete" tag related questions Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] "obsolete" tag related questions Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] "obsolete" tag related questions Toerless Eckert
  • [Rswg] Re: "obsolete" tag related questions Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: "obsolete" tag related questions Carsten Bormann
• [Rswg] RFC 9896 on SVG in RFCs rfc-editor
• [Rswg] Dave Rice: Re: [Cellar] math in RFCs Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: Dave Rice: Re: [Cellar] math in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: Dave Rice: Re: [Cellar] math in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: Dave Rice: Re: [Cellar] math in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: Dave Rice: Re: [Cellar] math in RFCs Martin Thomson
• [Rswg] mathematical notation in RFCs Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Joel Halpern
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Joel Halpern
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Jay Daley
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Brian Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs John R Levine
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Michael Richardson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Stephen Farrell
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Stephen Farrell
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Stephen Farrell
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] mathematical notation in RFCs Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Jay Daley
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Carsten Bormann
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: SVG ban subtlety [Re: mathematical notation in RFCs] Martin Thomson
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: mathematical notation in RFCs Carsten Bormann
• [Rswg] rswg - Not having a session at IETF 125 IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
• [Rswg] Fwd: Editorial stream state changed for draft-rswg-rfc7997bis Pete Resnick
• [Rswg] RFC Production Center report for January 2026 Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-xml2rfcv3-implemented-06.txt internet-drafts
• [Rswg] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025) Alexis Rossi
  • [Rswg] Re: End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025) Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025) Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] The Editorial Stream (was Re: [rsab] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025)) Eliot Lear
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] The Editorial Stream (was Re: [rsab] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025)) Jay Daley
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] The Editorial Stream (was Re: [rsab] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025)) Eric Rescorla
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] The Editorial Stream (was Re: [rsab] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025)) Jay Daley
  • [Rswg] Re: [rfc-i] The Editorial Stream (was Re: [rsab] End-of-Year Summary: RSCE Activities (2025)) Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] RFC Production Center report for December 2025 Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-06.txt internet-drafts
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-06.txt Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] I-D Action: draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-06.txt Pete Resnick
• [Rswg] Forum/Forums/Fora, Erratum/Erratums/Errata Rob Sayre
  • [Rswg] Re: Forum/Forums/Fora, Erratum/Erratums/Errata Scudder, John
  • [Rswg] Re: Forum/Forums/Fora, Erratum/Erratums/Errata Rob Sayre
• [Rswg] RFC Production Center open meeting - Nov 19 Jean Mahoney
• [Rswg] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 (about Latin script) John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 (about Latin script) Paul Hoffman
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 (about Latin script) Brian Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: [Ext] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 (about Latin script) John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 (about Latin script) Martin J . Dürst
• [Rswg] Issue summary from WGLC Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC Rob Sayre
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC (homograph attack surface) Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC (homograph attack surface) Brian E Carpenter
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC (homograph attack surface) Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC (homograph attack surface) John C Klensin
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC Pete Resnick
  • [Rswg] Re: Issue summary from WGLC John C Klensin
• [Rswg] feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 Jean Mahoney
  • [Rswg] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 Martin J . Dürst
  • [Rswg] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 Jean Mahoney
  • [Rswg] Re: feedback on draft-rswg-rfc7997bis-05 John C Klensin

• Earlier messages
• Later messages