On 26 Jun 2001, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's a solution with a non-growing buffer. This is getting disturbingly complex. I realize the problem is complex too, so this is no slur on Wayne's coding. My gut reaction is that if we start adding this then the program's behaviour will become even more baroque. I'll read it and see how it goes. -- Martin
- Anti-hang comments? Wayne Davison
- Re: Anti-hang comments? tim . conway
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Martin Pool
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Andrew Tridgell
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Wayne Davison
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Wayne Davison
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Wayne Davison
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Martin Pool
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Wayne Davison
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Phil Howard
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Dave Dykstra
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Phil Howard
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Jos Backus
- Re: Anti-hang comments? Ville Herva