patch from faith@alephnull to add rate indicator to --progress

[Martin Pool]

Any votes for/against?


----- Forwarded message from Rik Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:55:29 -0500
From: Rik Faith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rsync patch
X-Mailer: VM 6.96; XEmacs 21.1; Linux 2.4.16 (light)

Here is a patch that adds rate information (e.g., kB/s) to the
--progress display.  I just noticed that 2.4.7pre4 is coming out and I
realized I forgot to send this to someone.  Assuming I'm too late,
please let me know where I should send it (or if you'd like to see some
changes or just aren't interested at all).  Thanks, Rik.

[The motivation was to see how ssh's encryption and compression options
impact rsync throughput -- and to be sure I'm using the right options to
provide optimal throughput.]

--- rsync-2.4.6/util.c.rik      Tue Sep  5 22:46:43 2000
+++ rsync-2.4.6/util.c  Fri Oct  5 09:19:35 2001
@@ -835,28 +835,70 @@
        return (int)*s1 - (int)*s2;
 }
 
-static OFF_T last_ofs;
+static OFF_T  last_ofs;
+static struct timeval print_time;
+static struct timeval start_time;
+static OFF_T  start_ofs;
+
+static unsigned long msdiff(struct timeval *t1, struct timeval *t2)
+{
+    return (t2->tv_sec - t1->tv_sec) * 1000
+        + (t2->tv_usec - t1->tv_usec) / 1000;
+}
+
+static void rprint_progress(OFF_T ofs, OFF_T size, struct timeval *now)
+{
+    int           pct  = (int)((100.0*ofs)/size);
+    unsigned long diff = msdiff(&start_time, now);
+    double        rate = diff ? ((ofs-start_ofs) / diff) * 1000.0/1024.0 : 0;
+
+    if (ofs == size) pct = 100;
+    
+    rprintf(FINFO,"%12.0f %3d%%", (double)ofs, pct);
+
+    if (rate > 1024*1024) rprintf(FINFO, " %7.2fGB/s", rate/1024.0/1024.0);
+    else if (rate > 1024) rprintf(FINFO, " %7.2fMB/s", rate/1024.0);
+    else                  rprintf(FINFO, " %7.2fKB/s", rate);
+
+    rprintf(FINFO, (pct == 100) ? "\n" : "\r");
+}
 
 void end_progress(OFF_T size)
 {
        extern int do_progress, am_server;
 
        if (do_progress && !am_server) {
-               rprintf(FINFO,"%.0f (100%%)\n", (double)size);
+               struct timeval now;
+                gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
+                rprint_progress(size, size, &now);
        }
-       last_ofs = 0;
+       last_ofs   = 0;
+        start_ofs  = 0;
+        print_time.tv_sec  = print_time.tv_usec  = 0;
+        start_time.tv_sec  = start_time.tv_usec  = 0;
 }
 
 void show_progress(OFF_T ofs, OFF_T size)
 {
        extern int do_progress, am_server;
+        struct timeval now;
 
-       if (do_progress && !am_server) {
-               if (ofs > last_ofs + 1000) {
-                       int pct = (int)((100.0*ofs)/size);
-                       rprintf(FINFO,"%.0f (%d%%)\r", (double)ofs, pct);
-                       last_ofs = ofs;
-               }
+        gettimeofday(&now, NULL);
+
+        if (!start_time.tv_sec && !start_time.tv_usec) {
+               start_time.tv_sec  = now.tv_sec;
+                start_time.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
+                start_ofs          = ofs;
+        }
+
+       if (do_progress
+            && !am_server
+            && ofs > last_ofs + 1000
+            && msdiff(&print_time, &now) > 250) {
+               rprint_progress(ofs, size, &now);
+                last_ofs = ofs;
+                print_time.tv_sec  = now.tv_sec;
+                print_time.tv_usec = now.tv_usec;
        }
 }
 


----- End forwarded message -----
--
Martin