On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Steve G wrote: > I don't know if this amounts to much, but did you intend to use a & > rather than a && at line 739 of flist.c?
Fortunately both items in the "&" expression can only have the value of 1 or 0, so the effect is the same as "&&". It looks like a typo to me, though. ..wayne..
